Clients

Clients

Clients

Who we work with

Most of our work starts the same way

We work with leaders who feel they could be getting more out of their teams, processes, and technology, but aren’t sure where to begin.

Whether it’s complex work that’s hard to reduce, teams spending too much time on coordination, or uncertainty about where AI and automation create real value, we help organisations uncover clarity fast and act confidently.

Who we work with

Most of our work starts the same way

We work with leaders who feel they could be getting more out of their teams, processes, and technology, but aren’t sure where to begin.

Whether it’s complex work that’s hard to reduce, teams spending too much time on coordination, or uncertainty about where AI and automation create real value, we help organisations uncover clarity fast and act confidently.

Who we work with

Most of our work starts the same way

We work with leaders who feel they could be getting more out of their teams, processes, and technology, but aren’t sure where to begin.

Whether it’s complex work that’s hard to reduce, teams spending too much time on coordination, or uncertainty about where AI and automation create real value, we help organisations uncover clarity fast and act confidently.

Who we help

We work with leadership teams in established organisations that:

  • want an evidence-based understanding of how work actually happens

  • need to prioritise AI and automation decisions with confidence

  • are ready to move from insight to execution with measurable impact

  • want to improve productivity without increasing complexity

This often includes mid-sized to large businesses with fragmented workflows, unclear productivity metrics, or strategic decisions hinging on real work patterns.

Our Work

Activity Analysis: Professional Services Firm

28% effort SPENT on low value work

Industry: Legal & Professional Services
Team Size: 45 people (Partners, Associates, Support Staff)
Challenge: Partners suspected billable time was lower than it should be but couldn't identify why

What We Found:

  • Only 41% of senior associate time was spent on billable client work

  • 18% spent on internal coordination (status updates, scheduling, tracking)

  • 12% spent searching for documents, precedents, and case information

  • 8% on manual time tracking and admin processes

Impact:

  • Identified 320+ hours per month of re-capturable time

  • Prioritised automation of time tracking, document search, and client updates

  • Expected billable hour increase: 15-20% within 6 months

"We knew we had inefficiencies, but seeing the data was eye-opening. We were paying senior people £80+/hour to search through folders and update spreadsheets."

Client Partner

Our Work

Activity Analysis: Professional Services Firm

28% effort SPENT on low value work

Industry: Legal & Professional Services
Team Size: 45 people (Partners, Associates, Support Staff)
Challenge: Partners suspected billable time was lower than it should be but couldn't identify why

What We Found:

  • Only 41% of senior associate time was spent on billable client work

  • 18% spent on internal coordination (status updates, scheduling, tracking)

  • 12% spent searching for documents, precedents, and case information

  • 8% on manual time tracking and admin processes

Impact:

  • Identified 320+ hours per month of re-capturable time

  • Prioritised automation of time tracking, document search, and client updates

  • Expected billable hour increase: 15-20% within 6 months

"We knew we had inefficiencies, but seeing the data was eye-opening. We were paying senior people £80+/hour to search through folders and update spreadsheets."

Client Partner

Our Work

Activity Analysis: Professional Services Firm

28% effort SPENT on low value work

Industry: Legal & Professional Services
Team Size: 45 people (Partners, Associates, Support Staff)
Challenge: Partners suspected billable time was lower than it should be but couldn't identify why

What We Found:

  • Only 41% of senior associate time was spent on billable client work

  • 18% spent on internal coordination (status updates, scheduling, tracking)

  • 12% spent searching for documents, precedents, and case information

  • 8% on manual time tracking and admin processes

Impact:

  • Identified 320+ hours per month of re-capturable time

  • Prioritised automation of time tracking, document search, and client updates

  • Expected billable hour increase: 15-20% within 6 months

"We knew we had inefficiencies, but seeing the data was eye-opening. We were paying senior people £80+/hour to search through folders and update spreadsheets."

Client Partner

Opportunity Assessment: Mid-Market Manufacturer

ALL ALigned on priorities

Industry: Manufacturing & Distribution
Team Size: 150+ employees (focus on back-office)
Challenge: Board pressure to "adopt AI" but unclear where to start

What We Delivered:

  • Analysed 12 potential use cases across procurement, inventory, and customer service

  • Ranked by impact, effort, and time-to-value

  • Identified top 3 opportunities worth £800K+ annually in efficiency gains

Top Opportunities Identified:

  1. Automated purchase order processing (High impact, Medium difficulty, 3-month timeline)

  2. AI-powered inventory forecasting (High impact, High difficulty, 9-month timeline)

  3. Customer inquiry chatbot (Medium impact, Low difficulty, 6-week timeline)

Impact:

  • Clear prioritisation: Start with chatbot (quick win), then PO automation

  • Avoided pursuing low-ROI "AI for AI's sake" projects

  • Built 18-month roadmap with sequenced initiatives

Opportunity Assessment: Mid-Market Manufacturer

ALL ALigned on priorities

Industry: Manufacturing & Distribution
Team Size: 150+ employees (focus on back-office)
Challenge: Board pressure to "adopt AI" but unclear where to start

What We Delivered:

  • Analysed 12 potential use cases across procurement, inventory, and customer service

  • Ranked by impact, effort, and time-to-value

  • Identified top 3 opportunities worth £800K+ annually in efficiency gains

Top Opportunities Identified:

  1. Automated purchase order processing (High impact, Medium difficulty, 3-month timeline)

  2. AI-powered inventory forecasting (High impact, High difficulty, 9-month timeline)

  3. Customer inquiry chatbot (Medium impact, Low difficulty, 6-week timeline)

Impact:

  • Clear prioritisation: Start with chatbot (quick win), then PO automation

  • Avoided pursuing low-ROI "AI for AI's sake" projects

  • Built 18-month roadmap with sequenced initiatives

Opportunity Assessment: Mid-Market Manufacturer

ALL ALigned on priorities

Industry: Manufacturing & Distribution
Team Size: 150+ employees (focus on back-office)
Challenge: Board pressure to "adopt AI" but unclear where to start

What We Delivered:

  • Analysed 12 potential use cases across procurement, inventory, and customer service

  • Ranked by impact, effort, and time-to-value

  • Identified top 3 opportunities worth £800K+ annually in efficiency gains

Top Opportunities Identified:

  1. Automated purchase order processing (High impact, Medium difficulty, 3-month timeline)

  2. AI-powered inventory forecasting (High impact, High difficulty, 9-month timeline)

  3. Customer inquiry chatbot (Medium impact, Low difficulty, 6-week timeline)

Impact:

  • Clear prioritisation: Start with chatbot (quick win), then PO automation

  • Avoided pursuing low-ROI "AI for AI's sake" projects

  • Built 18-month roadmap with sequenced initiatives

Productivity Roadmap: Financial Advisory Firm

Clear ownership & value

Industry: Financial Services
Team Size: 60 advisors + 30 support staff
Challenge: Multiple competing AI initiatives, unclear prioritisation, team overwhelmed

What We Delivered:

  • Consolidated 9 proposed initiatives into coherent 24-month roadmap

  • Sequenced projects to balance quick wins with strategic transformation

  • Defined success metrics and ownership for each phase

Roadmap Structure:

  • Q1: Document search & retrieval automation (Quick win, builds confidence)

  • Q2-Q3: Client reporting automation (High impact, medium complexity)

  • Q4-Q1: AI-assisted compliance monitoring (High value, requires Q1-Q3 learnings)

Impact:

  • Reduced from 9 simultaneous pilots to 3 sequenced initiatives

  • Clear ownership: Who owns what, when, with what resources

  • Realistic timelines prevented burnout and initiative fatigue

"Before the roadmap, everyone had ideas but no one knew what to do first. Now we have a plan we can actually execute, and explain to the board."

Client CEO

Productivity Roadmap: Financial Advisory Firm

Clear ownership & value

Industry: Financial Services
Team Size: 60 advisors + 30 support staff
Challenge: Multiple competing AI initiatives, unclear prioritisation, team overwhelmed

What We Delivered:

  • Consolidated 9 proposed initiatives into coherent 24-month roadmap

  • Sequenced projects to balance quick wins with strategic transformation

  • Defined success metrics and ownership for each phase

Roadmap Structure:

  • Q1: Document search & retrieval automation (Quick win, builds confidence)

  • Q2-Q3: Client reporting automation (High impact, medium complexity)

  • Q4-Q1: AI-assisted compliance monitoring (High value, requires Q1-Q3 learnings)

Impact:

  • Reduced from 9 simultaneous pilots to 3 sequenced initiatives

  • Clear ownership: Who owns what, when, with what resources

  • Realistic timelines prevented burnout and initiative fatigue

"Before the roadmap, everyone had ideas but no one knew what to do first. Now we have a plan we can actually execute, and explain to the board."

Client CEO

Productivity Roadmap: Financial Advisory Firm

Clear ownership & value

Industry: Financial Services
Team Size: 60 advisors + 30 support staff
Challenge: Multiple competing AI initiatives, unclear prioritisation, team overwhelmed

What We Delivered:

  • Consolidated 9 proposed initiatives into coherent 24-month roadmap

  • Sequenced projects to balance quick wins with strategic transformation

  • Defined success metrics and ownership for each phase

Roadmap Structure:

  • Q1: Document search & retrieval automation (Quick win, builds confidence)

  • Q2-Q3: Client reporting automation (High impact, medium complexity)

  • Q4-Q1: AI-assisted compliance monitoring (High value, requires Q1-Q3 learnings)

Impact:

  • Reduced from 9 simultaneous pilots to 3 sequenced initiatives

  • Clear ownership: Who owns what, when, with what resources

  • Realistic timelines prevented burnout and initiative fatigue

"Before the roadmap, everyone had ideas but no one knew what to do first. Now we have a plan we can actually execute, and explain to the board."

Client CEO

Ready to work together?

Ready to work together?

Ready to work together?